Uncategorized Archives - McGregor & Partners Bucharest & Sofia

My Romanian friends know that as a British person, talking about the weather comes easily to me. This has been particularly so after what, for me at least, has been a summer of lovely weather in Bucharest and in Scotland. It will however have escaped few of us that elsewhere

in the world, people have not been so fortunate with their weather.

It should also not have escaped the notice of most of us that much of the “interesting” weather we are seeing is discussed in the context of global warming. The purpose of this article is not

to debate the science involved, but rather to draw the attention of readers to the COP26 conference which will take place in Glasgow in November 2021. In longer terms, this is the 26th Conference of the United Nations on Climate Change and is particularly significant, as it is expected that the nationally determined contributions towards mitigating climate change which were agreed in Paris in 2015 will be upgraded at COP26. This means that national measures to mitigate climate change – in particular the emission of greenhouse gasses – in participating states such as the UK and Romania are likely to be increased, with further measures to decarbonise the economy.

This presents a particular opportunity for business in Romania and in the UK, as well as a wake-up call for businesses to become more resilient (if this latter element was needed after businesses have coped with the current pandemic and disruption caused by both the virus and by measures to contain it).

Business opportunities from this should not be hard to find – for instance, both in Romania and in the UK, there have been significant developments of renewable energy to reduce the role of fossil fuels.

Resilience is an essential part of the sustainability of businesses: international supply chains and food security are obvious candidates for being adversely affected by changes in weather and climate. The issue goes beyond the availability of goods and foodstuffs: the risk of losses of agricultural products due to changing weather patterns has implications for financial services, whether through insurance or through futures and derivatives markets. Enforcement is also likely to be relevant to businesses – in the UK the ultra-low emissions zone for vehicles is already in force for vehicles in central London. Given the importance placed on planting trees to mitigate climate change, instances of illegal logging such as have appeared in the Romanian media over the years can be expected to take on a greater significance and it is to be hoped that this damaging practice can be effectively suppressed by serious enforcement measures (the curtailment of deforestation and the protection of ecosystems and natural habitats form specific parts of the goals of COP26).

The British Chambers of Commerce (to which the BRCC is affiliated as part of the BCC’s Global Network) sees the climate challenge as the single most important long-term issue and had a number of campaigns relating to it, as well as resources to assist businesses wherever they are located. At one end of the scale, the list of the principal partners of the COP26 event in Glasgow includes many large UK companies and multinationals. Changing business models to reduce carbon footprints and to improve resilience is not a matter for the large corporates alone, however. Small and medium-sized enterprises (“SMEs”) which form part of the supply chains of large corporates may of course find that they are asked by their large corporate customers to demonstrate their green credentials, just as they do in relation to the prevention of modern slavery and other labour abuses and exploitation.

SMEs should not however limit their ambitions to keeping larger supply-chain customers happy. SMEs make up a major part of the global economy and have a significant role to play in their own right. This importance is reflected in the UK’s Climate Hub (https://smeclimatehub.org/uk/ ) and also in the equivalent for SME’s elsewhere in the world (https://smeclimatehub.org/). Quite apart from the wider questions of climate change and of how businesses are perceived by their customers, staff and other stakeholders, taking practical measures to “future-proof” a business is good sense. Who could argue with measures such as minimising waste from products and packaging, making business premises heat-efficient and so on? As a simple example, I can remember the campaign some years ago to save power – and money – by switching off unnecessary lights. It was good business sense then and is good business sense now – as well as helping to meet the COP26 targets and mitigate the effects of any climate change. It is also good business sense to be ahead of market trends – and trends to further decarbonise the economy appear to be certain to follow COP26.

Sursa: Let’s talk about the weather…

Recent days have seen many positive news items about the progressive lifting of COVID restrictions and the return to what we used to regard as normality. This has coincided with my first business trip from Romania back to the UK, after getting my second vaccination in Bucharest at the end of May.

The need for a clear “fit to fly” test result means that all plans must be tentative and that the flight booking must be flexible. Fortunately, I am able to work effectively from home so the ten-day quarantine period, once I arrived back in the UK, posed no particular difficulties for me – but had I been required to isolate in a hotel rather than at home, it would probably have been a different matter. As it was, the permitted escapes from home to take and to post my “Day 2” and “Day 8” results gave me a welcome chance to go out during those ten days’ quarantine.

Emerging from self-isolation with clear tests, I was able to start my programme of meetings in London, albeit masked and observing social distancing. The National Health Service has an app which can be downloaded to a mobile telephone which is used to scan the QR codes found at the entrances to office and public buildings, as well as at restaurants and hotels. This is apparently intended to make it easier to trace a person’s contacts if he or she is found to have COVID. So far, so good.

All went very well for a few days but on switching my mobile back on one Monday lunchtime on emerging from a court hearing, I found that I had been “pinged”. The NHS app apparently also tracks the location of users relative to each other and apparently the system had detected that I had been near someone the day before who had since tested positive for COVID. The alert on the app informed me that I was required to self-isolate immediately for a further ten days. The disruption that this caused can be imagined and I found myself confined to a hotel room, albeit with room service and good Wi-Fi. Unfortunately, the app only told me the day on which I had been near the infected person and not the hour, so it was not possible to identify the circumstances (indoor/outdoor, masked, etc.) and so to assess the risk.

After cancelling my “face-to-face” programme in London I spent a good number of hours on the telephone to the NHS about what to do, and was eventually told that they would consider releasing me from isolation if I got three clear tests, including a PCR test. I was told that I should not use public transport to get to the test centre. Four days later I had taken and reported three clear tests and no symptoms, so I asked whether I could at least check out of the hotel and go home by taxi and train. Thankfully, I was allowed to do.

Whilst my main purpose in travelling from Romania for business in the UK was not frustrated by all of this, the current regulations made the whole exercise much harder, time-consuming and expensive than previously. Having been fully vaccinated in Romania – and having residence rights in Romania – gives me the peace of mind that I should be able to get back to Bucharest without similar levels of difficulty.

Notwithstanding that we have discovered how easy it is to do business remotely the news that in England at least, the requirement to go into quarantine for travellers from Romania who have been fully vaccinated is shortly to be lifted is – or should be – very welcome. The problem, however, is that it appears that only evidence of vaccination in England will be accepted for this purpose, so, if I need to return to the UK from Romania later this summer, I would still be required to go into ten days’ self-isolation on arrival from Romania.

At first sight there appears to be little logic in exempting from quarantine only those travellers who have been vaccinated in a particular country. It however appears that this may be linked to the issue of mutual recognition of vaccination certificates between different countries and there have been press reports that this is being negotiated. Business people need to have the ability to travel without unnecessary restrictions and expense, even if we may travel less than we used to do. The businesses which depend upon people travelling, whether for business or leisure, also need to see a recovery in international travel. This may be the first time that I have written an article in the hope that it will no longer be relevant by the time that it appears in print, but that is exactly what I – and no doubt many others – hope will happen. Please would those negotiating mutual recognition of vaccination certificates please take note?

Sursa: The article which is overtaken by events before publication – hopefully…